Compromise?

There is suasion, an opinion held by those who know most everything. That we conservatives should reconcile (with the liberal progressives), at least go halfway, which in liberal progressive speak is giving in to the initial as a prelude to the forthcoming. And I say rubbish to that idea.

Common knowledge implies that political workings within our Democratic Republic are an artful craft. A pragmatic give and take between counterparties to achieve a gainful result.

Or at least that is the accepted myth.

Instead, commiserating is in reality the capitulation by pieces and parts of American individualism and self-reliance. Liberal progressive persuasion has yielded the following results: A “re-imaging” of the federal constitution’s literal meaningfulness for one that favors whimsical variables. Individual liberty and personal freedom is now tenuously applied. Statutory laws so ambiguous they challenge a layperson’s comprehension. A non-elected byzantine bureaucracy that in a discretionary manner enforces some federal laws while ignoring others. A system of rules/regulatory processing that only the selected and privileged comprehend and tax regulations wherein even the experts require consultation.

Yes, conservatives for pragmatic, moral, political, ethical, capitalistic, socioeconomic, and religious reasons believe that the leftist socialistic policies and beliefs inherent within the Democratic Party are anathema to the American principles of liberty and personal freedom.

Compromise conservative values, blend the red with the blue for the ruse of unification, I say poppycock to that tosh.

Leave a Reply