What is the definition of a racist? What is the difference between prejudice, racial or not, and one’s preference? Can the government, by lawful coercion, impose moral sensibility?

Since the inception of “Black Lives Matter,” the nonsensical acceptance of unsubstantiated factoid delivered anti-police, anti-white people falsities have propagated and heretofore suppressed rational deduction in favor of fearful hesitation.

Views and perspectives counter to BLK acceptance are demonized as racists. Or, the open wide shrilling of white supremacists whose at best beliefs mirror the 1896 supreme court rulings of “separate but equal.”

People of all ethnicity, skin color, religion, gender, and ideological viewpoints have or can generate prejudice founded on irrational or rational inclinations. Homo sapiens can and often do exhibit dysfunctional, irrational, unreasonable behavior. Therefore, without abundant tolerance and a “live and let live” understanding exampled by the words of Rodney King’s “Please, we can get along here,” the continuum of senseless violence will generate more of the same.

The leadership of BLK and their proponents declare systematic racism as the primary scourge of America, the raison d’etre of their struggle; this declaration is not only unfounded. It is a scurrilous baseless untruth propagated in the style of Goebbels, Lenin, and Mao.

Minneapolis, Washington D.C, Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, and New York are cities  within a State managed by Democrats. Wherein leaders at every level of governing many of African descent liberal progressives are the leaders. How is it feasible that these Americans of African descent could implement then execute racists policies?

We Americans have a system of and for governing riot, burn, loot, and destroy is rightly outlawed within our governing system. Outlaws are arrested and prosecuted. There are lawful authorities enacted to enforce the laws of the land. However, unless utilized, the legitimately legal alternative to disorder are useless while the lawless run roughshod unabated in the pursuit of their lawlessness.

The matters of black lives are not above the law. BLK members, enthusiasts, and allies must express their displeasure within the four corners of the laws of the land or face legal consequences. America is the land of the free and home of the brave it is also the land of law and order.

Public health epidemiologists submitted to President Trump the following irrefutable conclusive. That according to monitored models, cognoscente knowledge, and clinically indicative observations of the lethally contagious COVID-19 virus unless the world’s most exceptional economy from sea to shining sea is abruptly disabled. The nation’s citizens locked down in their homes and immediate adherence to strict social distancing enforced. The infection would hospitalize hundreds of thousands and kill millions of Americans.

Fear of the unknown innately prompts desperate expressions. The pretense of knowing the kinetic properties of a newly formed virus and its effect on its host enables holistic rumors, conjecture, as well as, arm wrestling controversy—the changing of self-help deterrents for avoiding the coronavirus created as much confusion and anxiety as comfort.

One does not require a medical degree from Cornell University to deduce that older people, particularly with underlying ailments, are at a higher risk of any virus; therefore, as evidence displayed, facilities that harbor senior citizens are of particular concern.

Then why, is it that the epidemiologist experts like Doctor Fauci let the apparent slip into the land of Oz? Governor Cuomo forced the nursing homes to accept the infected onto the non-infected resulting in thousands of deaths. Seemingly, those matters are untouchable detractors mostly because, although he tried, Cuomo could not tag Trump as the blame.

There are many unanswerable whys. However, because the answers would expose incompetency, idiotic mistakes, and the silliness of actions motivated by political intent, the whys remain unanswered.

Noticeably, the Blue States openings are snail-like in comparison to the Red. The media and the Blue are fiercely anti-Trump; therefore, anything (at all) that works to defeat Trump is not only acceptable; it is a sublime duty.

I have become less tolerant and less understanding of the progressive agenda and persons. I now consider a compromise nothing less than an ignominious rout of my principles and values.

Liberal progressive governors and mayors are bewildered by the “in plain sight” substantive. They muddled in the midst of what is empirically apparent. Like a deer frozen by the oncoming light, these politicians, despite the present rioting and looting crises, prefer to favor the lawless actions of rioters (they call them protesters). While begrudgingly and ineffectively deploying police forces to ostensibly protect life and property.

It is discernibly obvious, Blue State leadership cannot lead and refuse to follow.

In this age of perpetuating news coverage calculatedly or unintentionally, media of every determined perspective stoke the embers, and fuel the impending chaos. By repeatably imaging the destruction of yesterday and rerunning the knee to neck murder violent behavior is proportionately readdressed and regenerated.

The videoed killing of George Floyd evidenced in the reoccurring present exemplar the very worst of apathetic behavior. However, the act was wickedly foul because  the torture evolving to the death of George could have been stopped. Instead of concentrating on i-phone filming for nine minutes this person could have responded to George’s plea of help: “I can’t breathe,” instead onlookers including the attending officers of the the law looked on instead of saving this man’s life.

The inability of onlookers to act they simply gawked and helplessly gaped for nine minutes. The struggling victim asks for relieve nonetheless the onlookers took no action. These observers would not step forward to save a life. This inability to act is (for me) startlingly shocking. It is as if the onlookers were seated in the Coliseum of 1^st century Rome viewing the killing of gladiators, slaves, riffraff, and lions.

We all want to believe that human life is precious, but when opportunities emerge to validate that premise all too often, we fade and retrograde into our shell of wantoned indifference.

This year there is a presidential election. I do believe that Blue State’s inaction on the present craziness and the coronavirus lock down revolves around the political calculations of attaining a political advantage. I also think that if the Republicans are not victorious, the constitutional state of affairs will bend a knee to progressive socialism. If that possibility becomes a reality we better start teaching Mandarin and agree to submit to the interest of the collective.