There is suasion, an opinion held by those who know most everything. That we conservatives should reconcile (with the liberal progressives), at least go halfway, which in liberal progressive speak is giving in to the initial as a prelude to the forthcoming. And I say rubbish to that idea.

Common knowledge implies that political workings within our Democratic Republic are an artful craft. A pragmatic give and take between counterparties to achieve a gainful result.

Or at least that is the accepted myth.

Instead, commiserating is in reality the capitulation by pieces and parts of American individualism and self-reliance. Liberal progressive persuasion has yielded the following results: A “re-imaging” of the federal constitution’s literal meaningfulness for one that favors whimsical variables. Individual liberty and personal freedom is now tenuously applied. Statutory laws so ambiguous they challenge a layperson’s comprehension. A non-elected byzantine bureaucracy that in a discretionary manner enforces some federal laws while ignoring others. A system of rules/regulatory processing that only the selected and privileged comprehend and tax regulations wherein even the experts require consultation.

Yes, conservatives for pragmatic, moral, political, ethical, capitalistic, socioeconomic, and religious reasons believe that the leftist socialistic policies and beliefs inherent within the Democratic Party are anathema to the American principles of liberty and personal freedom.

Compromise conservative values, blend the red with the blue for the ruse of unification, I say poppycock to that tosh.

A well-funded progressive socialist disorganization such as ANTIFA equates Republicans, conservatives, and Trumpians as fascist reminiscent of Hitler’s Brownshirt Nazis. BLM ideologically Maoists, espouse “Defund the Police,” crediting systematic racism as the goad, the mot juste, to explain police officers’ inclination to kill black and brown men.  

For these riotous ruffians, arrest by lawful authorities is not just a waste of time and money. For these scofflaws, an arrest is considered a rite of initiation, a badge of commitment to destructive or injurious action. Break a window, fracture a nose, an arm, or a leg, burn down a building, loot, rob, and steal; all is justified, say the racially oppressed and their inherently privileged white sympathizers.

These progressive left entities have zero interest in counterevidence or factual(s) that are aller a contre-courant or contrary to their indoctrinated beliefs. Therefore sanity requires that counterview tolerance must end with the inducement of fear, pending bodily harm, and the actuality of physical assault.

Any demonstration of grievance, jubilation, or the meeting of old friends armed with MAGA references and sponsorship is intimidated and demeaned by ANTIFA and BLM militants. The liberal progressive city and state governments will not protect any Trump supporter from physical abuse or general harm. Therefore, the organizers of MAGA demonstrations must anticipate the forthcoming and prepare for the worst outcome.

When those of the opposition to civic order equips with helmet, shield, baseball bat, and bricks, their intent is not to debate some argumentative merit—this is not the time to break out a camera, rely on one’s lawful behavior, or to disburse. It is the time to call in and tactically maneuver the embodied, equally armed, protectorates. The use of reasonable coercive force to counter coercive force is the definition of self-defense—the defense of another and the defense of a third party  

The loss of the presidential election amplifies the apparent need for self-protection. The average ally of Trump conservatism or opponent of the Biden Harris brand of progressive socialism would not ordinarily carry clubs, bricks, shields, or frozen plastic water bottles. The intent of the counterparties of Biden Harris, validated by their action, is not to suppress thought or voice. Conservatives endorse law and order as the bedrock of civil society.

ANTIFA and BLM are not interested in deductive rationality nor the societal sense of reasonableness. They want to rid the nation of the common sense of righteousness. Like the bully in the schoolyard, he/she of ANTIFA and BLM only respond to the like same in response. They are willing contrivers, contrarians, and belligerent doctrinaires. Prompted by the direction of the strongest wind, they chase after what does not exist. Believing the end justifies the means, they set aside virtue, moral sensibility, and countervailing arguments.

We conservatives cannot wax our ears, cover our eyes, and ignore cognitive sensibilities while these ignoramuses attempt to destroy our constitutional republic.  

It’s mid-November, the shocking result of Tuesday the 3^rd, election day has settled into grievous acceptance. There are caveats, hesitations, and concerns over the legality and general fairness of the Democratic win, but a win it is. And as a Democratic Party pundit righteously suggested: “suck it up, you lost.”

Now is the time for blame—a who to accuse, condemn, and prosecute possibly by public caning. Hot-blooded revenge must find satisfaction. Of course, there is no time for a proper investigation, so I recommend Decimation. Every tenth person in the Trump re-election campaign shall step forward for punishment.

But first, some assumptions: Yes, deeply committed liberal-progressive ideologues and their “useful idiot” brethren did act illegally, extralegally, and in ways perfectly legal to procure votes for the Biden Harris ticket. Is this the reason for the Trump-Pence loss? The answer is No.

The Republican Party, since the Regan era, because of their insistence on the utility of rational and reasonable, has not been able to speak persuasively to the American people. Americans receive newsworthy data via subliminal imaging, the conscious reading or viewing of information, and the persuasion of a friend, family, academic influencers, and political pundits. Therefore, personal regards blossom before one can establish an educated opinion. After all, feelings have no factual requirements. A collection of ambiguous factoids, coupled with imaginative images, are sufficient to deduce a thought contrary to Republican inducement.

Conservates find it hard to understand the Democrats winning on pledging to raise taxes and, at the same time, ending tax cuts, credits, instating medicare for all. Eliminating student loan debt, ending fracking on federal lands, re-joining the global warning crazies, initiating the new green deal, reinstating a governing regulatory emphasis, bailing out Blue State pension debt, re-imagining public safety, ending school choice, and enforcing abortion as a viable alternative.

When less than half of the population pays no taxes (a sort of disenfranchisement of the obligatory rights of citizenship), they know that it is the majority of the populace that will pay, not them. So raising taxes sounds useful to them. It’s the tried and true vote buying policy of give them bread, circus, and beer.

How and why was the re-election of Donald J. Trump a failure?

Amazingly, the R-party’s leadership could not convince enough of the American electorate of the Democrats’ wrongheaded policies. Or was the issue of concern not policies, but President Trumps’s insistence on a Trumpian governing style?

The president administered the nation as if the C.E.O of a worldwide private corporation. The United States is not a company; instead, it is a representative republic presented as a democracy. The president of this republic can hire and fire but must do so with respect and protocol. He cannot praise the nominee going into an office and vilify the very person going out.

President Trump worked diligently to make enemies of the rich, the famous, the critical, Field Officers of the armed forces, the elected, and arbitrarily anyone who displeased him. Well, as a private person, that’s a personal business decision. As the President of The United States, this sort of behavior is dysfunctional and inappropriate.

He invited the foxes into the henhouse and, I assume, convinced himself that truth and transparency would win the day. Incredibly, such a naïve, stupid, and insurmountably hurtful action, his inclination for self-destruction is remarkable.

Nonetheless, President Trump’s contribution to the Republican Party, America, and its people was and is a worthy blessing. He is a good man, a great president. I am disappointed in my fellow citizens’ disregard of all the solidly favorable policies in favor of a weak Biden espousing socialist tendencies. However, Trump could not overcome his greatest challenge: Donald J Trump.