Trump instigates, a kinetic of opinions dominate. The opposed to Trump mob converge, alert the media, then they scurrilously hyper exaggerate the particular to their advantage, within minutes the Trump acolytes counter, pundits display their bias, Democratic leadership considers impeachment, then everyone returns at the ready to their ideological zone.

This action, the to-and-fro of it are exhausting; nonetheless, relief remains, steadfastly, on the other side of the moon.

The normality of rational and reasonable has failed. Contesting seems everlasting. Possibly, this divisive stubbornness is the true meaning of a democracy that ignores the republic’s constitution: common sense, the distinctive American virtue of yesteryear. Has evolved, wherein today, the sense of the common incorporated with the Democratic Party is a mix of discombobulated leadership promising vague possibilities challenged with indeterminate endings. However, one must not discount the power within the party of the disquiet fastidious contrarians mingled within those that as a matter of course, bilaterally oppose any and every.

The haunting response of Benjamin Franklin when asked, “a republic if you can keep it.” It is a foreboding one cannot dismiss. But then “the beat goes on,” surely, one can realize as with the example of the Tower of Babel human software is a flawed defective operating with no active service warranty. Although software upgrades are integral, the updates often do not satisfy the operational concern.

This novella of the politically discontented (the Democratic Party) is a focused continuum of dysfunctional analysis, a display of a false interpretive overwhelming good sense, an exemplar of a political party passionately practicing the alchemist’s folly: the striving to align the world and its affairs as one wishes it instead of accepting and dealing with the reality of worldly affairs.

Since 1787 the question remains, can this republic govern within the four corners of the constitution?